[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminate str
|
From: |
Kevin Atkinson |
|
Subject: |
Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminate strings. |
|
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:36:04 -0600 (MDT) |
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Gary Setter wrote:
> I showed all the methods that are used when constructing a String
> object for a c string literal. One of those methods should have
> null terminated the string that begin_ points to. None did. If
> I'm wrong please show we where a String object constructed from a
> const char * is null terminated.
I repeat: The string is only null termined when the c_str() or
ensure_null_end() is called.
--
http://kevin.atkinson.dhs.org
- [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminate strings., Gary Setter, 2004/09/26
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminate strings., Kevin Atkinson, 2004/09/26
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminate strings., Gary Setter, 2004/09/27
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminate strings., Kevin Atkinson, 2004/09/27
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminate strings., Gary Setter, 2004/09/27
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminate strings.,
Kevin Atkinson <=
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminatestrings., Gary Setter, 2004/09/27
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminatestrings., Kevin Atkinson, 2004/09/27
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not nullterminatestrings., Lumina, 2004/09/27
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not nullterminatestrings., Kevin Atkinson, 2004/09/27