[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not nullterminatestrin
|
From: |
Kevin Atkinson |
|
Subject: |
Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not nullterminatestrings. |
|
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:47:19 -0600 (MDT) |
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Lumina wrote:
>
> > The std::string class (NOT the Microsoft string class) does NOT guarantee
> > that the string is always null terminated.
>
> For compatibility reasons, could you please guarantee it ? This way, the
> port to Windows would be easier. Thank you very much.
My answer should of been obvious by now.
--
http://kevin.atkinson.dhs.org
- [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminate strings., Gary Setter, 2004/09/26
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminate strings., Kevin Atkinson, 2004/09/26
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminate strings., Gary Setter, 2004/09/27
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminate strings., Kevin Atkinson, 2004/09/27
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminate strings., Gary Setter, 2004/09/27
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminate strings., Kevin Atkinson, 2004/09/27
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminatestrings., Gary Setter, 2004/09/27
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not null terminatestrings., Kevin Atkinson, 2004/09/27
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not nullterminatestrings., Lumina, 2004/09/27
- Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not nullterminatestrings.,
Kevin Atkinson <=