Re: [AUCTeX-devel] tex-symb repository at Google Code Hosting

[Ralf Angeli]

* Masayuki Ataka (2007-02-13) writes:

> # Which timing do you want to integrate tex-symb.el into AUCTeX?
> # Before AUCTeX 11.85?  After you rewrite TeX math codes?

Yes, when TeX Math mode will be done would be a good time.  I'm
currently working on it and will hopefully be able to present
something in course of next week.  I'll be travelling the coming days
including the weekend, so I don't know if I'll have time to work on
the mode till the beginning of next week.

> Uh, the complicated code let tex-fold not fold macros if the
> macro is [not] defined in tex-fold-math-spec-list, because function
> tex-fold-math folds macro `\foo' that have no corresponding
> symbol, to [foo].
>
> Maybe, we should add optional argument to tex-fold-math for
> ignoring folding macros iff the corrsponding symbol is not
> defined.

Yes.  Or we use a variable which can be let-bound during execution of
`TeX-fold-item'.  I'm not sure what the better solution would be.

-- 
Ralf