[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] program error?
From: |
E. Weddington |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] program error? |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Apr 2003 09:44:49 -0700 |
On 1 Apr 2003 at 23:11, Alex Shepherd wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> > So I figured I'd give avrdude on win32 another try. Last week it
> > detected a verification error even though my avrstudio was able to
> > program and verify just fine. It's still showing the same error:
> >
> > avrdude: verifying ...
> > avrdude: verification error, first mismatch at byte 0x0022
> > 0xb3 != 0xb0
> > avrdude: verification error; content mismatch
> >
> > avrdude done. Thank you.
>
> I think its really good to have this programmer now included with
> WinAVR. Now you really do only need a single package to get going,
> good work guys!
>
> However I too have been getting this verify error sometimes, not
> always but sometimes. It seems to have problems and that it is fine
> for quite some time. Before I started to type this email I retried it
> to capture the screen output but it was fine for a few runs and then
> failed about 3 times in a row and then was good for another 6 or so
> times. The addresses are not always in the same place, they seem to
> change. I'm pretty sure my hardware is ok as I can use PonyProg2000
> 2.05a for some time with no verify problems. See screen output below
>
> I would like to be able to use this, but because its not 100% reliable
> I am still using PonyProg called from my make file with a *.e2s file.
>
> My board is a Dontronics DT006, programmed via the parallel port and
> I'm running on Win2K.
>
> Also I am running avrdude from within the JFE (Jen's File Editor) and
> when it captures the output window, the updating numbers cause it to
> scroll. Running from the CMD.EXE window is fine of course. Would it be
> possible to have an option to print a "." for each block across the
> screen a bit like FTP, rather than the numbers to reduce the
> scrolling?
>
> Any suggestions?
>
Group,
Could this perhaps be a marginal timing issue? The Windows code
doesn't go through the ioctl stuff and may execute slightly faster.
I'm not as knowledgeable about programming and any potential timing
issues.
Eric