avrdude-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avrdude-dev] program error?


From: E. Weddington
Subject: Re: [avrdude-dev] program error?
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 09:44:49 -0700

On 1 Apr 2003 at 23:11, Alex Shepherd wrote:

> Hi Guys,
> 
> > So I figured I'd give avrdude on win32 another try. Last week it
> > detected a verification error even though my avrstudio was able to
> > program and verify just fine. It's still showing the same error:
> > 
> > avrdude: verifying ...
> > avrdude: verification error, first mismatch at byte 0x0022
> >          0xb3 != 0xb0
> > avrdude: verification error; content mismatch
> > 
> > avrdude done.  Thank you.
> 
> I think its really good to have this programmer now included with
> WinAVR. Now you really do only need a single package to get going,
> good work guys!
> 
> However I too have been getting this verify error sometimes, not
> always but sometimes. It seems to have problems and that it is fine
> for quite some time. Before I started to type this email I retried it
> to capture the screen output but it was fine for a few runs and then
> failed about 3 times in a row and then was good for another 6 or so
> times. The addresses are not always in the same place, they seem to
> change. I'm pretty sure my hardware is ok as I can use PonyProg2000
> 2.05a for some time with no verify problems. See screen output below
> 
> I would like to be able to use this, but because its not 100% reliable
> I am still using PonyProg called from my make file with a *.e2s file.
> 
> My board is a Dontronics DT006, programmed via the parallel port and
> I'm running on Win2K.
> 
> Also I am running avrdude from within the JFE (Jen's File Editor) and
> when it captures the output window, the updating numbers cause it to
> scroll. Running from the CMD.EXE window is fine of course. Would it be
> possible to have an option to print a "." for each block across the
> screen a bit like FTP, rather than the numbers to reduce the
> scrolling?
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 

Group,

Could this perhaps be a marginal timing issue? The Windows code 
doesn't go through the ioctl stuff and may execute slightly faster. 
I'm not as knowledgeable about programming and any potential timing 
issues.

Eric




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]