RE: Re[3]: [avrdude-dev] AVR910 Programming speed

[Daniel Williamson]

Concerning the speed difference. Is there a way to turn off the output to
the terminal window?
or perhaps just increment it every n bytes.
On Win2k running a dos window I've written programs that write to the
terminal window and it can really make a difference.
Even for a few 10's of writes using printf it makes a noticible difference.
If somebody with a working source could patch out the display code and time
it then it's another possibility tried.

Dan.


-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden Behalf
Of Bertolt Mildner
Sent: 07 April 2003 16:00
To: Theodore A. Roth
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re[3]: [avrdude-dev] AVR910 Programming speed


Hello Theodore,

Sunday, April 6, 2003, 3:01:29 AM, you wrote:

TAR> Try the latest cvs now. I just committed the changes to implement
handing of
TAR> the the auto incr addr feature.

TAR> Dumping the entire 8K of flash from an 8515 took 46 second without auto
incr
TAR> and 21 second with. YMMV.

Thanks!

But your changes caused verification to fail!

The problem is in avr910_paged_load().
Replacing the line #595:

     avr910_recv(pgm, &m->buf[addr * rd_size], rd_size);

with

     for (run = rd_size - 1; run >= 0; run--) {
       avr910_recv(pgm, &m->buf[(addr * rd_size) + run], 1);
     }

fixes it for me. Byte pairs (words) are received in reverse order.

Programming time is now down to about 2:15, which is much better than
before but still not very close to the 1:10 with AVR Studio.

I really wonder what AVR Studio does different!?

--
Best regards,
 Bertolt                            mailto:address@hidden



_______________________________________________
avrdude-dev mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev