[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h> |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Oct 2003 19:35:31 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 07:13:32PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 06:05:13PM +0000, Robert Millan wrote:
> > I think we should disallow direct inclusion of <linux/*.h> in Glibc, any
> > comments?
>
> There don't exist any <linux/*.h> headers in glibc, they come from
> Linux.
IIRC, Glibc build process takes them from specified location and installs them
in /usr/include/linux/.
So there's room to apply some patches.
--
Robert Millan
"[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he
gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work."
-- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, (continued)
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/10/04
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Robert Millan, 2003/10/04
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Roland McGrath, 2003/10/04
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Robert Millan, 2003/10/04
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Roland McGrath, 2003/10/04
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Robert Millan, 2003/10/04
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Marco Gerards, 2003/10/04
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Robert Millan, 2003/10/04
- RE: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Gregg C Levine, 2003/10/04
Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Jeroen Dekkers, 2003/10/04
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>,
Robert Millan <=
Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Farid Hajji, 2003/10/04
Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Robert Millan, 2003/10/04