Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>

[Marco Gerards]

Robert Millan <zeratul2@wanadoo.es> writes:

> > Why CC bug-hurd?  This has nothing at all to do with the Hurd.  It doesn't
> > affect us at all what the linux headers contain, so please don't give a
> > wrong impression.
> 
> I believe you're not looking at it from the perspective of a porter who
> has to fix hundreds of broken packages which include <linux/*.h>. Please
> do that and my point will be made obvious.

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't debian-hurd for porting issues?
Anyway, just keep irritating people some Hurd related list is the
wrong list is just bureaucratic, sorry for that.

I just don't understand what glibc has to do with improving the way
people code, especially when dealing with linux header files.  I
understand your frustration, but I do not think this just is the right
way to fix the problem IMHO.

As usual, please correct me if I'm wrong.

--
Marco