[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>
From: |
Jeroen Dekkers |
Subject: |
Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h> |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Oct 2003 19:54:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 07:35:31PM +0000, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 07:13:32PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 06:05:13PM +0000, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > I think we should disallow direct inclusion of <linux/*.h> in Glibc, any
> > > comments?
> >
> > There don't exist any <linux/*.h> headers in glibc, they come from
> > Linux.
>
> IIRC, Glibc build process takes them from specified location and installs them
> in /usr/include/linux/.
>
> So there's room to apply some patches.
No they don't. Some distribution put those headers in a package called
glibc, but glibc itself doesn't do anything with them (except using it
in the glibc code itself of course).
Jeroen Dekkers
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, (continued)
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Robert Millan, 2003/10/04
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Roland McGrath, 2003/10/04
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Robert Millan, 2003/10/04
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Roland McGrath, 2003/10/04
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Robert Millan, 2003/10/04
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Marco Gerards, 2003/10/04
- Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Robert Millan, 2003/10/04
- RE: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Gregg C Levine, 2003/10/04
Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Jeroen Dekkers, 2003/10/04
Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Farid Hajji, 2003/10/04
Re: disallow direct inclussion of <linux/*.h>, Robert Millan, 2003/10/04