|
From: | lilypond |
Subject: | Re: Issue 1752 in lilypond: redesigning G clef in our Feta font |
Date: | Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:44:01 +0000 |
Comment #28 on issue 1752 by address@hidden: redesigning G clef in our Feta font
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1752 2011/7/25 address@hidden:
I would never notice the difference between the old and new glyphs.
:-)
Adding \override Staff.Clef #'style = xx complicates Lilypond. An alternate font also adds complication.
Today, if I wanted to, I could \set Staff.clefGlyph = #"clefs.petrucci.g"
Ah, i didn't know about this! Looks like the most elegant and clean solution to me. ...However, i was unable to apply this override to a change clef - how it's done?
I would support simply adding the glyph with a name that reminds us it is proposed as an improvement, intended to fit well with the rest of the Feta font.
No, we already decided that we want it as new default. Now we're only deciding what to do with the old glyph,
Then you could convince people of its worth by making beautiful scores with \set Staff.clefGlyph = #"clefs.G_proposed"
I don't think this would work. I had my time for convincing people when we discussed new clef shape in thread "font survey: which clef do you prefer?" - and i managed to do it :)
cheers, Janek
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |