Re: Issue 1752 in lilypond: redesigning G clef in our Feta font

[Carl Sorensen]

On 7/24/11 2:19 PM, "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
wrote:

> 
> 
> Comment #25 on issue 1752 by percival.music.ca: redesigning G clef in our
> Feta font
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1752
> 
> The "critical regression" thing was a complete brain fart from me and
> should be scornfully ignored.  I also now agree that the idea of an
> \override for this specific glyph should be dropped.
> 
> However, I am aghast that the "font switching architecture" is going
> nowhere.  As far as I understand it,
>    1. we can switch to a different OTF font.  (aka "gonville")

>    2. we *CANNOT* switch to a different metafont font ?


Not quite.  We can only switch to gonville through an ugly hack.  There is
no difference between switching to gonville and switching to a different
metafont font.

Thanks,

Carl