[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: annoying `note' warnings
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: annoying `note' warnings |
Date: |
Wed, 03 May 2006 21:30:23 +0300 |
> From: Alper Ersoy <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 11:34:00 +0300
> Cc: Karl Berry <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden,
> address@hidden,
> address@hidden
>
> > I agree. Silent changes behind authors' backs are BAD.
>
> Well, not totally silent though.
??? The suggestion was to make it silent.
> This is what happens with web browsers and HTML. Documents are converted to
> proper formats internally if there is a problem with the markup. This is to
> protect the readability of the document against the author's misuse of the
> markup language.
This is not the same situation. It is one thing to escape-protect
special characters so that the results looks as the author intended.
And it's quite another thing to change the text (as opposed to its
markup).
- annoying `note' warnings, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/05/02
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Karl Berry, 2006/05/02
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Alper Ersoy, 2006/05/02
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Karl Berry, 2006/05/02
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Alper Ersoy, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Alper Ersoy, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/04
Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/05/04
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/04
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Karl Berry, 2006/05/04
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/05/04