[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: annoying `note' warnings
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: annoying `note' warnings |
Date: |
Thu, 4 May 2006 13:52:17 -0500 |
Warnings are either useful or not.
It is possible for warnings to be useful for most documents, but not
all. In that case, a document-level way of turning off the warning is
not unreasonable, seems to me. In the case at hand, a document about
music, the word "note" is obviously special and can't be changed.
Some bogus cross-references in Info may be unavoidable.
> What do you think of a address@hidden' instruction, something like
> @address@hidden value}}
Such generality would be difficult to implement. I would prefer to
create a command @nwstrong. In practice, @strong{note} is by far the
most common complaint about a warning (ever since it was created).
(Unless someone wants to take this opportunity to actually implement
some convention for arbitrary cross-references in Info ...)
karl
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, (continued)
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Alper Ersoy, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Alper Ersoy, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/04
Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/03