[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: annoying `note' warnings
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: annoying `note' warnings |
Date: |
Thu, 04 May 2006 09:11:32 +0200 (CEST) |
> > We sometimes use "note" in a different way, in the sense of a musical note.
>
> Okay, but then why does it have to be in @strong?
Why not? We use it as documented:
The address@hidden' command is seldom used except to mark what is, in
effect, a typographical element, such as the word `Caution' in the
preceding example.
Note the `typographical element'.
What do you think of a address@hidden' instruction, something like
@address@hidden value}}
> It would be really nice to see examples, as requested.
Here it is.
@node breve
@section breve
@strong{note value}, twice as long as a whole note. Mainly used in
pre-1650 music.
Werner
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, (continued)
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Karl Berry, 2006/05/02
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Alper Ersoy, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Alper Ersoy, 2006/05/03
- Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/04
Re: annoying `note' warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/03