bug-wget
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-wget] flock is not available on solaris 10 (at least sparc)


From: Tim Rühsen
Subject: Re: [Bug-wget] flock is not available on solaris 10 (at least sparc)
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 18:39:23 +0100
User-agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.2.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.14.14; x86_64; ; )

You might be right, thanks for pointing out (I never use tarballs, that's why 
I don't have them in mind). 

Giuseppe created the tarballs on a system with flock() available. AFAIK, 
gnulib jumps in only when needed. Maybe the gnulib-flock implementation didn't 
find it's into the tarball ? We have to check that.

Tim

Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2015, 18:21:43 schrieb Darshit Shah:
> If he's talking about releases, he is probably using the release
> tarballs. Those don't need ./bootstrap
> 
> On 12 December 2015 at 18:15, Tim Rühsen <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
> > 
> > did you ./bootstrap, ./configure, make clean, make after updating ?
> > 
> > Especially without ./bootstrap flock might not be taken from gnulib (which
> > call lockf if flock is not available).
> > 
> > Regards, Tim
> > 
> > Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2015, 17:42:10 schrieb Christian Jullien:
> >> Hi, trying to compile wget-1.17 and now wget-1.17.1 on solaris 10 sparc
> >> using gcc  5.2.0 , I get:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> hsts.c:505:11: warning: implicit declaration of function 'flock'
> >> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> >> 
> >>            flock (fd, LOCK_EX);
> >>            
> >>            ^
> >> 
> >> hsts.c:505:22: error: 'LOCK_EX' undeclared (first use in this function)
> >> 
> >>            flock (fd, LOCK_EX);
> >>            
> >>                       ^
> >> 
> >> hsts.c:505:22: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for
> >> each function it appears in
> >> 
> >> Makefile:1573: recipe for target 'hsts.o' failed
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I solved compilation issue by replacing flock (line 505) by lockf which
> >> is
> >> (POSIX.1-2001)
> >> 
> >> =>          lockf (fd, F_LOCK, 0);
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Hope it helps.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Christian




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]