[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] (load ...)
From: |
Alejandro Forero Cuervo |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] (load ...) |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jun 2007 16:34:48 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
> I'm curious on the compiled/interpreted boundary when it comes to (load ...).
The load form gets compiled, but it only gets executed in runtime.
That is, the code in the load'ed file will be interpreted (assuming
the load'ed file is a Scheme code file; you could also load shared
objects).
For example, if you compile a file with “(load "foo.scm")” and run it,
it will complain about missing “foo.scm” at runtime, not compile time.
Alejo.
http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/
- [Chicken-hackers] (load ...), Peter Keller, 2007/06/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] (load ...),
Alejandro Forero Cuervo <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] (load ...), Peter Keller, 2007/06/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] (load ...), Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2007/06/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] (load ...), Peter Keller, 2007/06/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] (load ...), Graham Fawcett, 2007/06/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] (load ...), Graham Fawcett, 2007/06/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] (load ...), Peter Keller, 2007/06/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] (load ...), Graham Fawcett, 2007/06/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] (load ...), Peter Keller, 2007/06/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] (load ...), John Cowan, 2007/06/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] (load ...), John Cowan, 2007/06/07