Re: [Chicken-hackers] Request to edit manual Foreign type specifiers

[Felix]

> I will say this: adding a dedicated tag <foreign-type-spec> -- that will be 
> used only on one page ever -- seems kind of silly.  On the other hand, the 
> more generic tag <specifier> seems to be incompatible with how chicken-doc is 
> currently implemented and used.  So we may have to resort to a dedicated tag.

I would suggest a "<type>" tag, which can be used for foreign- and (forthcoming)
specialization type specifiers. It is generic enough to be re-usable for 
different
type-related purposes and having multiple entities of type "type" in the same
document is confusing enough for the reader to be avoided.


cheers,
felix