Re: [Chicken-hackers] Request to edit manual Foreign type specifiers

[Jim Ursetto]

On May 28, 2011, at 4:26 AM, Felix wrote:

> I would suggest a "<type>" tag, which can be used for foreign- and 
> (forthcoming)
> specialization type specifiers. It is generic enough to be re-usable for 
> different
> type-related purposes and having multiple entities of type "type" in the same
> document is confusing enough for the reader to be avoided.

OK, <type> now works in chicken-doc and qwiki.

I have added <type> tags to the foreign types documentation, reorganized the 
page and expanded its contents.  If you like, have a look at one of:

http://api.call-cc.org/doc/foreign/types
http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/Foreign%20type%20specifiers

Jim