Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] sequence type corrections and enhancements

[Peter Bex]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:51:55AM +0200, Felix wrote:
> > 
> > I think you overlooked these entries:
> > 
> > - reverse: argument and result
> > - member, assv, assoc: specialization types
> > 
> > Also, member has a (forall a) in its declaration but doesn't use it,
> > which looks wrong to me.
> > 
> > Further, "set-groups!" from POSIX is declared to accept a generic list.
> > This could probably be improved to (list-of (or fixnum number)), I think.
> > 
> 
> Thanks for pointing this out. If you are willing to sign off and
> apply this patch, I'd like to fix that in a different one.

I have no idea how this works.  Just saying "I'm okay with it" and
merging it in from your branch?

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth