Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] sequence type corrections and enhancements

[Peter Bex]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:52:58AM -0400, Felix wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:51:55AM +0200, Felix wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > I think you overlooked these entries:
> >> > 
> >> > - reverse: argument and result
> >> > - member, assv, assoc: specialization types
> >> > 
> >> > Also, member has a (forall a) in its declaration but doesn't use it,
> >> > which looks wrong to me.
> >> > 
> >> > Further, "set-groups!" from POSIX is declared to accept a generic list.
> >> > This could probably be improved to (list-of (or fixnum number)), I think.
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> Thanks for pointing this out. If you are willing to sign off and
> >> apply this patch, I'd like to fix that in a different one.
> > 
> > I have no idea how this works.  Just saying "I'm okay with it" and
> > merging it in from your branch?
> 
> For example. You can also use "git commit --amend" to modify the commit
> message of the current branch tip after you merged or cherry-picked.
> Well, that is what I think it does.

I have no idea how to apply several patches with cherry-pick.
There's three patches now, one of which neccessary to resolve conflicts
which means I can't apply them one by one.

Can someone please explain how the hell to apply patches like this?
I can't merge because this will apply all patches and won't skip the
one from the other message.

God, I hate git.

Annoyed,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth