[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-hackers] compiling Chicken 4.7.0 with musl instead of glibc
From: |
Jefferson Gafton |
Subject: |
[Chicken-hackers] compiling Chicken 4.7.0 with musl instead of glibc |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Feb 2012 15:25:37 -0800 |
In my quest for a statically compiled, lean and mean Chicken, I decided to try
compiling Chicken 4.7.0 with musl instead of glibc.
(http://www.etalabs.net/musl/faq.html)
While some of the compile went without complaint, there were a bunch of errors
and warnings during the compilation of posixunix.c
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/545853/
After a discussion about this on #musl, it was suggested on #chicken that the
#musl discussion be forwarded to this list, which I am doing now. Please see
the log here:
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/545882/
It seems that Chicken might have some portability and POSIX compatibility
issues that need to be addressed before it could be compiled with musl or other
similar libraries like ulibc or dietlibc that are sometimes used instead of
glibc.
--Sergey
____________________________________________________________
Send any screenshot to your friends in seconds...
Works in all emails, instant messengers, blogs, forums and social networks.
TRY IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if2 for FREE
- [Chicken-hackers] compiling Chicken 4.7.0 with musl instead of glibc,
Jefferson Gafton <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] compiling Chicken 4.7.0 with musl instead of glibc, John Cowan, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] compiling Chicken 4.7.0 with musl instead of glibc, Felix, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] compiling Chicken 4.7.0 with musl instead of glibc, Sergey, 2012/02/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] compiling Chicken 4.7.0 with musl instead of glibc, John Cowan, 2012/02/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] compiling Chicken 4.7.0 with musl instead of glibc, Peter Bex, 2012/02/06