[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" de
From: |
Mario Domenech Goulart |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 07:26:05 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) |
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 01:06:55 -0400 Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden>
wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 23:09:42 +0200 (CEST) Felix <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>>> I can not reproduce this, and only can test on a PPC64 (gcc compile
>>>> farm). This bug looks a bit obscure.
>>>
>>> I can't either on NetBSD/macppc, but AFAIK Mario can reproduce it
>>> reliably. If Mario needs help in debugging it, perhaps he can arrange
>>> for this box to be available at certain hours, for us to test on?
>>
>> Mario: can you try a newer GCC version? What happens when you use
>> DEBUGBUILD=1 ?
>
> Just built the 4.8.0rc3 tarball with gcc-4.7 and DEBUGBUILD=1 (installed
> Debian unstable on a chroot environment) and the lolevel test that was
> breaking works now!
>
> So it seems that it is a gcc issue on PPC.
>
> I'm building the 4.8.0rc3 tarball with DEBUGBUILD unset to confirm it is
> ok.
4.8.0rc3 works fine with GCC 4.7.1 and DEBUGBUILD unset on Linux/PPC.
I'm closing #916, since it seems to be a GCC issue on that platform.
Mario
--
http://parenteses.org/mario
- [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Felix, 2012/09/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Peter Bex, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Felix, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Peter Bex, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Felix, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Peter Bex, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Felix, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2012/09/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration,
Mario Domenech Goulart <=
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Peter Bex, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, John Cowan, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Peter Bex, 2012/09/08
- [Chicken-hackers] Cygwin issues, John Cowan, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Cygwin issues, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Cygwin issues, John Cowan, 2012/09/08
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Cygwin issues, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2012/09/08
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Cygwin issues, John Cowan, 2012/09/08
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Cygwin issues, Felix, 2012/09/09