Re: [Chicken-hackers] dropping srfi-1

[Peter Bex]

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 08:07:39PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I noticed that Evan is heavily working on "modularizing" the core
> units in the chicken-5 branch. Before our branches diverge too much,
> we should consider whether the "drop-srfi-1" branch should be merged.
> 
> I have added an "unused" declaration to mini-srfi-1.scm, but did not
> rename the primitives defined there, it appeared too ugly to me. I can
> still do that, if you think this is better (a suggestion in what way
> these operations should ne named would be appreciated in that case).
> 
> Peter mentioned that a squash-commit would be undesirable, so how
> should this be handled, in case the change should be added?

Since nobody else has replied to this, can you explain exactly what's
going on?  You added a (declare (unused ...)), IIUC, but I don't see why
or how this will cause trouble with a merge.

Cheers,
Peter

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature