[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Should we make a 4.12 release?
From: |
Mario Domenech Goulart |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Should we make a 4.12 release? |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Jan 2017 19:22:22 +0100 |
Hi Felix,
On Sun, 01 Jan 2017 01:08:23 +0100 address@hidden wrote:
>> Felix: what was the original intended behavior for -prefix, regarding
>> handling of dependencies?
>
> IIRC, it was just a hack for overriding the installation prefix, among other
> crude methods (CHICKEN_PREFIX, or CHICKEN_INSTALL_PREFIX, or whatever,
> I lost track...).
>
> It should go, IMHO. No prefix-overriding at all should be allowed.
The question was actually related to C4, as the behavior of -prefix
changed in 4.11 (see http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1298 ).
Regarding C5, any idea on how to implement a tool like salmonella?
All the best.
Mario
--
http://parenteses.org/mario
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Should we make a 4.12 release?,
Mario Domenech Goulart <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Should we make a 4.12 release?, felix . winkelmann, 2017/01/03
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Should we make a 4.12 release?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2017/01/03
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Should we make a 4.12 release?, felix . winkelmann, 2017/01/03
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Should we make a 4.12 release?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2017/01/03
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Should we make a 4.12 release?, felix . winkelmann, 2017/01/03
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Should we make a 4.12 release?, Christian Kellermann, 2017/01/04
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Should we make a 4.12 release?, felix . winkelmann, 2017/01/04
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Should we make a 4.12 release?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2017/01/04
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Should we make a 4.12 release?, felix . winkelmann, 2017/01/04
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Should we make a 4.12 release?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2017/01/04