[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation
From: |
Frederic Lehobey |
Subject: |
Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:00:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:15:08AM +0100, Jeremy Dubreil wrote:
> In some cases this might lead to something we would wish to avoid.
> Indeed, if a voter A tries to delegate the question Q to the other
> participants then he can infer who is on a path of delegation to him.
> And in the same time he can find out who is not delegating to him
No, not all. What he can find is who is delegating ot not his
_delegate_ vote (only) to him. Remember (public) delegations (= votes
as delegate) are _public_. He does not know anything about the private
vote (and has no means to).
Please do not loop into inexisting problems we have already solved a
(very) long time ago.
Experimentally,
Frédéric
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, Felix HENRY, 2007/01/11
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, David MENTRE, 2007/01/11
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, Felix HENRY, 2007/01/11
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, ketty, 2007/01/11
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, David MENTRE, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, Jeremy Dubreil, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, David MENTRE, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, Felix HENRY, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, David MENTRE, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, Frederic Lehobey, 2007/01/15
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation,
Frederic Lehobey <=