[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation
From: |
Frederic Lehobey |
Subject: |
Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:05:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 03:41:01PM +0100, Felix HENRY wrote:
> I make here another proposal to simplify things (this would be a big change
> as compared to
> our previous plans) "If you accept to be a delegate on a certain
> subject/question,
> then you are not allowed to delegate this question/subject to anyone else"
> Please feel free to object/discuss/elaborate on this,
I thought that when we have discussed this we said a way to order the
delegations (like we are sorting the answers when voting) would
automatically solve this kind of loops.
Experimentally,
Frédéric
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, Felix HENRY, 2007/01/11
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, David MENTRE, 2007/01/11
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, Felix HENRY, 2007/01/11
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, ketty, 2007/01/11
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, David MENTRE, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, Jeremy Dubreil, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, David MENTRE, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, Felix HENRY, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, David MENTRE, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation,
Frederic Lehobey <=
- Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation, Frederic Lehobey, 2007/01/15