[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Auth]What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft
From: |
John |
Subject: |
[Auth]What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft) |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Jan 2002 12:30:07 -0600 |
All opinions are mine own. Any misinterpretations are my own fault.
IDsec is secure, but it's not particularly private. The amount of
metadata IDsec freely passes, simply by conducting a transaction, is
while not astounding, not small either. I read the whole of the
document, but I found this problem in the overview and it stuck in my
craw all the way though.
- [Auth]What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft),
John <=
- [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), Hans Zandbelt, 2002/01/05
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), David Sugar, 2002/01/05
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), John, 2002/01/05
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/01/05
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), Mike Warren, 2002/01/09
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/01/09
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), Hans Zandbelt, 2002/01/10
- [Auth]A real life case in Identity, Albert Scherbinsky, 2002/01/10
- Re: [Auth]A real life case in Identity, Albert Scherbinsky, 2002/01/11
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), Mike Warren, 2002/01/11