Re: [DotGNU]kerberos

[jpetzold]

yeah but it would be a GPLed fork that would more than likely follow need and 
have cool new features that actualy work (as opposed to the M$ fork)

and what is with MIT and realesing under BSD is it just me or do they do that 
often?  not that there is anything bad about that, it is a good way to get a 
cool new technology adopted by the industry.

On Wednesday 18 July 2001 23:57, David Sugar wrote:
> Technically yes, you can GNU BSD code.  Politically, it may be far more
> trouble than it's worth.  In essense, it would be a permenant fork...
>
> Jeremy Petzold wrote:
> > Hey, I was thinking (ya ya I know :)  )
> >
> > any way, I am not a lawer, but the kerberos Licence is
> > basicly do what you want just tell the leagal
> > restraints about export, well would it then be
> > possable to take it and just GPL the thing?
> >
> > turn it into GNUberos? just wondering.
> >
> > -Jeremy
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Developers mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers