[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming
From: |
Rich Hilliard |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 02:57:39 GMT |
| all though that is a scarry thought, I would think that an action of
| that sort would be conidered steeling and the information was moved
| wothout the person's knowledge. M$ is not that stupid.
How to undermine slamming, using the DCMA:
Someone asked in another post if there was a way to use the new
copyright act against M$. This comes to mind in discussion of slamming:
- Create a license for end users to license their personal
information with copyright and declaring terms of its use.
- Encrypt the personal info
- If M$ or anyone tries to break that for slamming purposes, they run
afoul DCMA, under Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems :-)
"No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide,
or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device,
component, or part thereof, that is primarily designed or produced
for the purpose of cicumventing a technological measure that
effectively controls access to a work protected under this
title;..."
-- Rich
- Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD., (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD., John, 2001/07/27
- Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD., Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/28
- Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD., Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/28
- [DotGNU]login service slamming, Ron Burk, 2001/07/28
- Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/29
- Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming, Jeremy Petzold, 2001/07/30
- Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming, Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/30
- Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming,
Rich Hilliard <=
- [DotGNU]Encryption orthogonal to slamming, Ron Burk, 2001/07/31
- Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming, Rich Hilliard, 2001/07/31