[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD.
From: |
Barry Fitzgerald |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD. |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jul 2001 13:29:35 -0400 |
Norbert Bollow wrote:
> > > My twisted little mind has thought: "What if this simple single
> > > logon standard spreads very quickly among web site designers,
> > > and what if dotGNU were to claim IP in it, and grant rights
> > > to all but Microsoft-controlled companies,
>
> But our fight is primarily for freedom, not against Microsoft.
>
> Microsoft deserves to have the same freedom that everyone should
> have. The only freedom that Microsoft must not have is the
> freedom to do things that effectively result in our freedom
> being taken away from us.
>
> Greetings, Norbert.
Yeah, if we did that, Microsoft might actually have a right to complain
about their "freedom to innovate" so to speak...
-Barry
- [DotGNU]DCMA devils, Ron Burk, 2001/07/27
- Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils, Jeremy Petzold, 2001/07/27
- Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/27
- Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD., John, 2001/07/27
- Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD., Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/28
- Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD.,
Barry Fitzgerald <=
- Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD., Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/28
- [DotGNU]login service slamming, Ron Burk, 2001/07/28
- Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/29
- Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming, Jeremy Petzold, 2001/07/30
- Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming, Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/30
- Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming, Rich Hilliard, 2001/07/31
- [DotGNU]Encryption orthogonal to slamming, Ron Burk, 2001/07/31
- Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming, Rich Hilliard, 2001/07/31