Re: [DotGNU]Re: [Mono-list] Mono/dotGNU Love-In Proposals

[Simon Cozens]

On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 02:28:06PM +0100, Martin Coxall wrote:
> Indeed. But to assume that *none* of them has a point is hubristic, surely. 
> Look, all I am saying is that Mono so far has not done a good job of PR, 
> relations with Portable.NET and dotGNU, and communication in general. Here we 
> have an easy way to rectify all those issues in one fell swoop.
> 
> Would we not be foolish not to take that route?

Can I make an even more revolutionary suggestion?

Let's get on with getting the code right first, and worrying about the
PR later. What's actually the important thing, here?

-- 
ADVERSITY:
    That Which Does Not Kill Me Postpones the Inevitable

                                                    http://www.despair.com