Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [D

dotgnu-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [D

From:	Bill Lance
Subject:	Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables))
Date:	Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:29:55 -0800 (PST)

--- Carsten Kuckuk <address@hidden> wrote:
> It's clearly an abuse of their monopolistic powers
> in the Windows
> world. I hope that somebody is left in the DOJ who
> recognizes this
> and takes care of it.
> 

Haha  .. I doubt that possibility.  It seems Gates has
bought this administration.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
http://movies.yahoo.com/

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 2002/03/22
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), David Sugar, 2002/03/22
  - AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 2002/03/22
  - Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Barry Fitzgerald, 2002/03/22
    - AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 2002/03/22
    - Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Barry Fitzgerald, 2002/03/22
    - Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Bill Lance <=
    - Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/23
    - Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 2002/03/23
    - Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 2002/03/24
    - Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Bill Lance, 2002/03/24
    - Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/24
    - Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 2002/03/24
    - Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), David Sugar, 2002/03/24
    - Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/25
    - Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 2002/03/25
    - Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/24

Prev by Date: Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables))
Next by Date: RE: [DotGNU]treecc: -g option
Previous by thread: Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables))
Next by thread: Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread