[DotGNU]Re: [Vrs-development] SEE and VRS combined. A first look.

[Chris Smith]

On Saturday 26 October 2002 07:38, Ian Fung wrote:
> so just to make sure. we're basically doing a vrs where the vm for
> execution is going to be a see right?

No.
The SEE has some specific requirements that the VRS does not require, and 
vice versa.  However, the actual bit that accepts, decodes and executes 
requestes for webservices is common to both.

So you take this common bit, add some more functionality and you get a SEE.
Take the same common bit, add some different functionality and you get a VRS.

It is very probably that an LDS in the VRS can have the 'SEE' specific bits 
installed too making the the whole VRS look like a SEE from the outside - 
which is a grand thing.

Chris

>
> -alias
>
> On 10/25/02 12:35 PM, "Chris Smith" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > ... and a new acronym! (sorry!)
> >
> > This is a rough draft but it has a nice diagram.
> >
> > It essentially describes the skeleton code framework I'm producing to
> > demonstrate where I think we are with the VRS/SEE concept and how the
> > middleware and messaging used in the VRS actually works in practice (for
> > those interested in that kind of thing - namely developers!).
> >
> > This should go on the VRS website at some point, but I've put it on mine
> > for now 'cos it was easier.
> >
> > http://www.nfluid.com/dgee/dgee.html
> >
> > Like I said it's rough and contains omittions.
> > I do not want it to be confuing.  I'm trying to clear the air and make
> > everyone experts :o)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vrs-development mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/vrs-development

-- 
Chris Smith
  Technical Architect - netFluid Technology Ltd.
  "Internet Technologies, Distributed Systems and Tuxedo Consultancy"
  E: address@hidden  W: http://www.nfluid.co.uk