[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Starting of the swigging of pnet
From: |
Rhys Weatherley |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Starting of the swigging of pnet |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Mar 2003 19:35:13 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
On Sunday 16 March 2003 07:05 pm, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> Second the pnivoke is the standard generated code for swig,
> Once it works, I will work on making them internalcalls.
Internalcalls are intended for things inside pnetlib, not third party code.
If the engine was built as a shared object, then there'd be no significant
difference between using PInvoke and internalcalls (PInvoke would probably be
slightly faster actually).
> Fourthly I can then make pnet run inside of Perl, Ruby, Java, etc as a
> module. Then I can remove the IL Parser from the ILStubberAuto and just
> read the ILImage directly into perl.
OK - I'll buy that. Just remember that the pnet code is GPL'ed, and so the
swig-wrapped version must be too.
Cheers,
Rhys.
- [DotGNU]Starting of the swigging of pnet, James Michael DuPont, 2003/03/15
- Re: [DotGNU]Starting of the swigging of pnet, Rhys Weatherley, 2003/03/15
- Re: [DotGNU]Starting of the swigging of pnet, James Michael DuPont, 2003/03/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Starting of the swigging of pnet,
Rhys Weatherley <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Starting of the swigging of pnet, James Michael DuPont, 2003/03/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Starting of the swigging of pnet, Rhys Weatherley, 2003/03/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Starting of the swigging of pnet, James Michael DuPont, 2003/03/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Starting of the swigging of pnet, Norbert Bollow, 2003/03/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Starting of the swigging of pnet, Rhys Weatherley, 2003/03/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Starting of the swigging of pnet, James Michael DuPont, 2003/03/19
- Re: [DotGNU]Starting of the swigging of pnet, Fergus Henderson, 2003/03/19
- Re: [DotGNU]Starting of the swigging of pnet, James Michael DuPont, 2003/03/19
[DotGNU][OT] The GPL and Creativity : What is Intent, Fair Use and why does it have no meaning in Free Software?, James Michael DuPont, 2003/03/16