[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3
From: |
Chris Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3 |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Apr 2003 10:42:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
On Tuesday 15 Apr 2003 01:02, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
> There is nothing stopping a non-free business from using DotGNU as they see
> fit. The GPL is quite clear that businesses can use GPL'ed code internally
> with no redistribution conditions. It is only once the code leaves the
> premises that the redistribution conditions activate. Most businesses are
> consumers of software, not producers, and so there will be no problem with
> them using DotGNU.
>
-- cut --
> Software producers are held to a higher standard by the GPL, and that is
> the way it should be. Whether we choose to allow non-free producers to use
> our system as a base is a separate issue from how software consumers use
> it.
Nicely put.
--
Chris Smith
Technical Architect - netFluid Technology Ltd.
"Internet Technologies, Distributed Systems and Tuxedo Consultancy"
E: address@hidden W: http://www.nfluid.co.uk
- [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, Norbert Bollow, 2003/04/09
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, James Michael DuPont, 2003/04/14
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, Rhys Weatherley, 2003/04/14
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, James Michael DuPont, 2003/04/15
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3,
Chris Smith <=
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, James Michael DuPont, 2003/04/15
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, Rhys Weatherley, 2003/04/15
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, James Michael DuPont, 2003/04/16
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, Rhys Weatherley, 2003/04/16
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, James Michael DuPont, 2003/04/16
Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, Norbert Bollow, 2003/04/16