[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3
From: |
James Michael DuPont |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3 |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Apr 2003 04:30:23 -0700 (PDT) |
--- Chris Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 Apr 2003 01:02, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
> > Software producers are held to a higher standard by the GPL, and
> that is
> > the way it should be. Whether we choose to allow non-free
> producers to use
> > our system as a base is a separate issue from how software
> consumers use
> > it.
>
> Nicely put.
And way off the mark.
At this moment the Dotgnu system is only usable by developers. There
are no products that could be used by anyone.
I think that it is a mistake to close the door to non-free
customization and support of the dotgnu.
In fact, the lacking of any obvious industry support is just a symptom
of this thought pattern.
mike
=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com
- [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, Norbert Bollow, 2003/04/09
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, James Michael DuPont, 2003/04/14
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, Rhys Weatherley, 2003/04/14
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, James Michael DuPont, 2003/04/15
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, Chris Smith, 2003/04/15
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3,
James Michael DuPont <=
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, Rhys Weatherley, 2003/04/15
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, James Michael DuPont, 2003/04/16
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, Rhys Weatherley, 2003/04/16
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, James Michael DuPont, 2003/04/16
Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - Draft Version 0.3, Norbert Bollow, 2003/04/16