[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package
From: |
Marcus |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:47:16 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.1 |
On Thursday 18 March 2004 6:34 am, Maciek wrote:
> Thanks :) Actually I do feel appreciated, I was certainly very
> encouraged by the very warm response from you, Rhys and Norbert.
>
> The problem is that by building the package with Cygwin I've caused
> unnecessary legal problems for Norbert who offered to host the package
I wouldn't worry about legal problems. They're all abstract and theoretical in
nature. Just wait until someone shows up with a subpoena and you have to deal
with it in court.
Things in the Free software arena are getting to the point that you basically
have to adopt the philosphy I mentioned above.
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Christopher Faylor, 2004/03/17
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Maciek, 2004/03/17
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Christopher Faylor, 2004/03/18
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Maciek, 2004/03/18
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Ilyak, 2004/03/19
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Norbert Bollow, 2004/03/19
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Gopal V, 2004/03/19
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Christopher Faylor, 2004/03/19
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Norbert Bollow, 2004/03/20
Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Maciek, 2004/03/17
Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package,
Marcus <=