[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM
From: |
Tim Jansen |
Subject: |
Re: [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM |
Date: |
Sat, 29 May 2004 15:18:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6 |
On Friday 28 May 2004 08:20, Chris Lattner wrote:
> It's not that. The problem is that there is a limited marked for this
> kind of thing. Open source is really bad because everyone reinvents the
> wheel.
If I interpret LLVM's license correctly, it's BSD with advertising clause and
thus incompatible with the GPL. That would be a major obstacle for many
people who would want to use it as a library.
> The primary advantage that libjit has over LLVM seems to be the
> availability of a C API.
Which is quite useful if you want to run the VM in your target language and
use libjit as the only native code. (You need an interpreter in order to
start/bootstrap the VM though, or it would be desirable to save a native
program like llvm does)
Another libjit advantage is that there are very few dependencies, which can be
useful if your target platform is new.
bye..
- [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM, Chris Lattner, 2004/05/27
- Re: [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM, Rhys Weatherley, 2004/05/27
- Re: [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM, Chris Lattner, 2004/05/27
- Re: [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM, Rhys Weatherley, 2004/05/27
- Re: [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM, Chris Lattner, 2004/05/27
- Re: [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM, Rhys Weatherley, 2004/05/28
- Re: [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM, Chris Lattner, 2004/05/28
- Re: [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM, Gopal V, 2004/05/28
- Re: [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM, Chris Lattner, 2004/05/28
- Re: [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM,
Tim Jansen <=
- Re: [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM, Chris Lattner, 2004/05/29
- Re: [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM, Rhys Weatherley, 2004/05/29
- Re: [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM, Chris Lattner, 2004/05/29
- Re: [Libjit-developers] libjit vs LLVM, Rhys Weatherley, 2004/05/29