Re: [Libjit-developers] License change - up for a vote

[ktreichel]

Hi,

i'd vote for GPL + LE like the classpath license to allow any program to be 
linked with libjit but force toe users to make the source of the libjit version 
used (including their modifications) available.

Klaus

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Gopal V <address@hidden>
> Gesendet: 09.02.07 07:19:06
> An: address@hidden
> Betreff: [Libjit-developers] License change - up for a vote


> Hi,
> 
> What's the general position on relicensing libjit as GPL+LE or LGPL ?
> 
> Show of hands for a relicensing before upcoming release please ?
> 
> (Southern Storm gets a casting vote)
> 
> This is being put forward because libjit needs a lot more users and
> despite what its original intentions were, the codebase is in danger
> of stagnating with just x86 if deprived of more users for too long.
> 
> I haven't written a single line of code for libjit, to date - so I'm
> doing the counting and not voting.
> 
> Cheers,
> Gopal
> -- 
> If I learn from my mistakes, pretty soon I'll know everything.
> _______________________________________________
> Libjit-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libjit-developers
> 


_____________________________________________________________________
Der WEB.DE SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
http://smartsurfer.web.de/?mc=100071&distributionid=000000000066