[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Dotgnu-libjit] Re: [Dotgnu-pnet] CVS is down -> Switching to SVN?
From: |
Klaus Treichel |
Subject: |
Re: [Dotgnu-libjit] Re: [Dotgnu-pnet] CVS is down -> Switching to SVN? |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:36:24 +0200 |
Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 20:03 +0200 schrieb Radek Polak:
> Alexander Stein wrote:
>
> > I know, I'm not an active developer, but I think switching to svn wouldn't
> > change anything in such situations, because you also need a central server.
> > To
> > avoid such problems where the central server isn't reachable you better use
> > a
> > decentralized version control system like git.
>
> Hi,
> i aggree. As bazaar and git user i have to say that i am really happy
> with them and SVN seems to me step back. But if it will be SVN in the
> end it will still be much better then CVS :)
>
> Radek
Ok, i'm trying to convert the cvs repository to git right now.
The last complete backup is from 2009-04-29 so everything committed
after that day has to be applied again.
Klaus
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dotgnu-pnet mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dotgnu-pnet
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Re: [Dotgnu-libjit] Re: [Dotgnu-pnet] CVS is down -> Switching to SVN?, MikyT, 2009/06/02
[Dotgnu-libjit] Re: [Dotgnu-pnet] CVS is down -> Switching to SVN?, James Hess, 2009/06/05