Re: Re: [Dotgnu-libjit] Re: [Dotgnu-pnet] CVS is down -> Switching to SVN?

[drobosson]

On Jun 3, 2009 2:36am, Klaus Treichel <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 20:03 +0200 schrieb Radek Polak:
> 
> > Alexander Stein wrote:
> 
> >
> 
> > > I know, I'm not an active developer, but I think switching to svn wouldn't
> 
> > > change anything in such situations, because you also need a central server. To
> 
> > > avoid such problems where the central server isn't reachable you better use a
> 
> > > decentralized version control system like git.
> 
> >
> 
> > Hi,
> 
> > i aggree. As bazaar and git user i have to say that i am really happy
> 
> > with them and SVN seems to me step back. But if it will be SVN in the
> 
> > end it will still be much better then CVS :)
> 
> >
> 
> > Radek
> 
> 
> 
> Ok, i'm trying to convert the cvs repository to git right now.
> 
> The last complete backup is from 2009-04-29 so everything committed
> 
> after that day has to be applied again.

I'd prefer SVN over CVS.  I've been spoiled by the likes of Tortoise(SVN|CVS) over the years.  To be honest and fair though, I know nothing of git so I would not be able to make a properly informed decision at this point in time, :)

Deryk