[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WebScheme (was: Re: Dogus (was: Re: [Visionaries] DG-Scheme))
From: |
James Michael DuPont |
Subject: |
Re: WebScheme (was: Re: Dogus (was: Re: [Visionaries] DG-Scheme)) |
Date: |
Fri, 9 May 2003 00:55:39 -0700 (PDT) |
n3 is Notation3 http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3.html
the standard input to cwm and euler :
It is a simplified, text based rdf format.
for example, here http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Logic.html
here is a primer :
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/Primer
mike
--- Peter Minten <address@hidden> wrote:
> James Michael DuPont wrote:
> >
> > I like the name. Dogus sounds Bogus.
>
> Hehe, I agree. Actually I thought to use that for a slogan: 'Dogus,
> cause it's
> not bogus' :-).
>
> > While you are at it, can you include
> > the features of n3? we can use it as a n3/rdf/triples manipulation
> > language.
>
> WebScheme will support RDF. I'm not sure what you mean by n3 though.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Peter
>
=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
- Dogus (was: Re: [Visionaries] DG-Scheme), Peter Minten, 2003/05/05
- Re: Dogus (was: Re: [Visionaries] DG-Scheme), Norbert Bollow, 2003/05/05
- WebScheme (was: Re: Dogus (was: Re: [Visionaries] DG-Scheme)), Peter Minten, 2003/05/06
- [Visionaries] Re: WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/07
- Re: [Visionaries] Re: WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/08
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/09
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/11
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/11
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/13
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/15
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, James Michael DuPont, 2003/05/15
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/17
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, James Michael DuPont, 2003/05/18