[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme
From: |
Peter Minten |
Subject: |
Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme |
Date: |
Tue, 13 May 2003 18:57:47 +0200 |
Peter Minten wrote:
>
> The loose end hunt continues.
An irritating inconsistency has been the capitilization of class names. In order
to make things work like they should I'm inserting a new convention: class names
should be in lower case and between sharp braces (like in GOOPS). This means
String becomes <string>, StringPort <string-port>, etc. This also means
(String.new) becomes (<string>.new).
Another convention, when using class names in field names the braces should be
left out. Thus not (obj.-><string>) but (obj.->string).
Greetings,
Peter
- WebScheme (was: Re: Dogus (was: Re: [Visionaries] DG-Scheme)), (continued)
- WebScheme (was: Re: Dogus (was: Re: [Visionaries] DG-Scheme)), Peter Minten, 2003/05/06
- [Visionaries] Re: WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/07
- Re: [Visionaries] Re: WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/08
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/09
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/11
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/11
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme,
Peter Minten <=
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/15
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, James Michael DuPont, 2003/05/15
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/17
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, James Michael DuPont, 2003/05/18
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, James Michael DuPont, 2003/05/18
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/16