[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WebScheme (was: Re: Dogus (was: Re: [Visionaries] DG-Scheme))
|
From: |
Peter Minten |
|
Subject: |
Re: WebScheme (was: Re: Dogus (was: Re: [Visionaries] DG-Scheme)) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 08 May 2003 18:57:49 +0200 |
James Michael DuPont wrote:
>
> I like the name. Dogus sounds Bogus.
Hehe, I agree. Actually I thought to use that for a slogan: 'Dogus, cause it's
not bogus' :-).
> While you are at it, can you include
> the features of n3? we can use it as a n3/rdf/triples manipulation
> language.
WebScheme will support RDF. I'm not sure what you mean by n3 though.
Greetings,
Peter
- Dogus (was: Re: [Visionaries] DG-Scheme), Peter Minten, 2003/05/05
- Re: Dogus (was: Re: [Visionaries] DG-Scheme), Norbert Bollow, 2003/05/05
- WebScheme (was: Re: Dogus (was: Re: [Visionaries] DG-Scheme)), Peter Minten, 2003/05/06
- [Visionaries] Re: WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/07
- Re: [Visionaries] Re: WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/08
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/09
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/11
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/11
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/13
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/15
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, James Michael DuPont, 2003/05/15
- Re: [Visionaries] WebScheme, Peter Minten, 2003/05/17