dotgnu-visionaries
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Visionaries] Sourcery Rules


From: Derek Lewis
Subject: [Visionaries] Sourcery Rules
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 01:24:54 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2.1) Gecko/20010901

Peter Minten wrote:

Well, it would be nice if you could take a look at the rules file (attached, and long) and tell me what you think of it :-).


The following comments resulted from a first pass at reading the rules file. I found it a little terse in places but expect my understanding to improve with further, much closer, reading.

So in order for piece C to block attacking piece A that attacks piece
B the following must be true:

Piece B is in the defense range of piece C.
                 AND
Piece A has no evader that piece B doesn't have.


Should the above be:

                          AND
        Piece A has no evader that piece C doesn't have and
        piece C has an evader that piece A doesn't have.

ie does the evaders of the attacking piece have to be a *proper* subset of the evaders of the blocking piece for blocking to work, or is it sufficient for the two sets to be equal?


The alignments of a card affect the behaviour of the piece and the
behaviour of other pieces with regard to the piece. For example some
spells may not work against pieces of some alignment.


I found this a little tricky to follow, but I think I got the idea.

Avatars are very powerful creatures that are actually owned by a god
but given to you in exchange for a certain cost. Half gods don't have
avatars, they just appear themselves. Usually one has to pay a
summoning cost to get the avatar to the battlefield and a pay to keep
them there for another turn.


Is the currency life points?


Extension tournaments allow a player that wins a number of battles
against equally skilled players to get card templates from an
extension set in all other tournaments. No card templates can be won
in this kind of tournament.


Does this mean the player wins the ability to obtain card templates from an extension set but does not actually win a card template as a result of this tournament?



Looks like fun. Do you think it would be suitable for mobile devices?


Regards,

Derek
--
Derek A. Lewis
E-mail: address@hidden
Phone:  +44-(0)20-8829 9342
Mobile: +44-(0)79-4151 3364




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]