Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing

[Peter Schuller]

> I'm not so sure about that. I googled for the error and there were
> issues last may with the tar.py(?) file and Python 2.5 (regardless of
> the backend) because of "nulls". There were patches for that in some
> distribution and they should have been incorporated by now, I hope.

Hmm. Do you still have the URL:s?

In any case, as far as I can tell these problems are being hit before any 
tar/gzip:ing takes places. The backend has listed the available failes and it 
has been parsed into a collection, but somehow the internal supposedly 
complete list of backups chains is empty.

I didn't figure it out by mere inspection, but could you try grabbing the 
latest duplicity from CVS, and applying the attached patch? It adds some more 
logging output at level 9, and also adds an assertion.

Another run at -v9 with the patch applies may shed some light on the problem.

-- 
/ Peter Schuller

PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <address@hidden>'
Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to address@hidden
E-Mail: address@hidden Web: http://www.scode.org

duplicity_morelogging.patch
Description: Text Data

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.