Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing

[Peter Schuller]

> Is anyone familiar enough with WebDAV to say off the top of your head what
> the correct interpretation is here? It should not be a huge problem to add
> support for absolute URL:s, but it would help to have some background on
> the protocol.

To be clearer; one simple fix is to just ignore the scheme and host portion. 
But what is correct behavior if, for example, the scheme/host does not match 
that which was used in accessing the document? Is this supported/required to 
be supported by webdav?

My suggestion right now is to ensure the scheme/host matches, and then ignore 
it (barring someone doing something more proper). This shoud work in this 
case, and it should hopefully remain safe for any use in the future where it 
does *not* match (erroring out with a suitable message).

Provided I can conjure up a webdav account I'll implement such a change, if no 
one objects to the above.

-- 
/ Peter Schuller

PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <address@hidden>'
Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to address@hidden
E-Mail: address@hidden Web: http://www.scode.org

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.