[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing
From: |
Peter Schuller |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 19:29:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
> Did that: still the same error
> ("duplicity.collections.CollectionsError: No backup chains found").
> Although the verbose output has slightly increased:
>
> webdav path decoding and translation:
> https://server/backup/ -> //server/backup/
> https://server/backup/duplicity-full-signatures.2008-02-27T16%3A54%
> 3A29Z.sigtar.gz -> //server/backup/duplicity-full-signatures.2008-02-
> 27T16:54:29Z.sigtar.gz
> https://server/backup/duplicity-full.2008-02-27T16%3A54%3A29Z.manifest
> -> //server/backup/duplicity-full.2008-02-27T16:54:29Z.manifest
> https://server/backup/duplicity-full.2008-02-27T16%3A54%
> 3A29Z.vol1.difftar.gz -> //server/backup/duplicity-full.2008-02-
> 27T16:54:29Z.vol1.difftar.gz
Hmm. This indicates urlparse does not know about the "https" scheme and
therefore does not know that the component following "//" is a hostname. This
is strange given that duplicity uses its own internal urlparse_2_5 module
which should be consistent regardless of Python version. Observe:
>>> import duplicity.urlparse_2_5 as urlparse
>>> urlparse.urlparse("http://host/path.ext")
('http', 'host', '/path.ext', '', '', '')
>>> urlparse.urlparse("https://host/path.ext")
('https', 'host', '/path.ext', '', '', '')
>>> urlparse.urlparse("unknownscheme://host/path.ext")
('unknownscheme', '', '//host/path.ext', '', '', '')
I cannot figure out why https would not be known for you. Anyone else have an
idea of what's going on here?
Anyways, it can be worked around if nothing else. Probably won't do much
tonight though - calling it a day early.
--
/ Peter Schuller
PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <address@hidden>'
Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to address@hidden
E-Mail: address@hidden Web: http://www.scode.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, (continued)
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/03/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing, Darik Horn, 2008/03/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/03
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Darik Horn, 2008/03/03
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/04
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/07
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/07
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/07
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/07
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/08
[Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/07
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/07
[Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/08
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/08