Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API

[Andrew Kohlsmith (lists)]

On October 26, 2008 06:33:30 pm Dan Muresan wrote:
> As long as duplicity compiles and runs (a) without dbus, and (b) with an
> installed, but stopped dbus daemon, there is no issue. Otherwise, it
> becomes harder to install / run it on some servers (or in an embedded
> context). That would be a pity, because duplicity doesn't necessarily
> fall into the "desktop utilities" category.

Those are my *exact* concerns as well.  If *runtime* DBus support is optional 
(i.e. compiled with dbus support, but dbus isn't running), and *compile time* 
DBus support is optional, I think this would be an awesome feature to add.

-A.