[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API
|
From: |
Serge Wroclawski |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API |
|
Date: |
Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:16:51 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 08:12:14PM -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) wrote:
> Those are my *exact* concerns as well. If *runtime* DBus support is optional
> (i.e. compiled with dbus support, but dbus isn't running), and *compile time*
> DBus support is optional, I think this would be an awesome feature to add.
This is the second time I've read "compiled" in this thread.
Duplicity is written in Python, so what the heck are you guys talking about?
- Serge
- [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Michael Terry, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Serge Wroclawski, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Serge Wroclawski, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Dan Muresan, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Andrew Kohlsmith (lists), 2008/10/26
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API,
Serge Wroclawski <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Dan Muresan, 2008/10/27