[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything
From: |
Edgar Soldin |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay? |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:38:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 |
> I think the log level should be moved down to 3 (default) on this one.
> Opinions?
>
Didn't Michael kind of name the log levels or tried at least? .. kind of
warning, info, debug ...
online man page states
-->
*-v*/[0-9]/*, --verbosity */[0-9]/
Specify verbosity level (0 is total silent, 3 is the default, and 9
is noisiest).
<--
This should be more detailled. If somebody gives me an overview I could
think of a more detailed description for the manpage.
address@hidden .. do the --log-* commands interpret the -v switch or
do they always put out -v9 ?
..ede
> ...Ken
>
> Richard Scott wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have an active S3 backup routine setup and I've not had issues backing up
>> or restoring files.
>>
>> However, when I run this:
>>
>> # /usr/bin/duplicity verify -v 9 --archive-dir=/var/lib/duplicity/etc
>> s3+http://uniquefoldername/etc /etc
>> Verify complete: 1162 files compared, 1 difference found.
>>
>> I don't know how to display what the difference is?
>>
>> I get vary little output... I thought the "-v 9" would turn on verbose
>> output?
>>
>> I have the following installed:
>>
>> app-backup/duplicity-0.5.12
>> dev-lang/python-2.4.3-r4
>> dev-lang/python-2.5.2-r7
>> dev-python/boto-1.6b
>> dev-python/py-gnupg-0.3.2
>> dev-python/pycrypto-2.0.1-r6
>>
>> # python -V
>> Python 2.5.2
>>
>> Ken, is there any commands I can test or check for you?
>>
>> Rich.
>>
>>
>>> It turns out we're on the same system across the board. I thought I had
>>> not upgraded to 8.04.2, but it looks like I did. 32-bit here as well.
>>>
>>> Not sure what's going on. If you get the chance, try a restore and make
>>> sure its OK. I just don't see any problem from here. I do want to find it
>>> though, so maybe
>>> someone else can chip in.
>>>
>>> ...Ken
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Josh, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Josh, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Josh, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Maurizio Vitale, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Richard Scott, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?,
Edgar Soldin <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/25
- Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Edgar Soldin, 2009/03/25
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Michael Terry, 2009/03/27
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, edgar . soldin, 2009/03/30
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Michael Terry, 2009/03/30
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/30
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Michael Terry, 2009/03/30
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/30
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Josh, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Josh, 2009/03/25